At the recently held Home Entertainment Show in New Delhi,
LG finally revealed its much awaited Ultra Definition TV, which boasts of a
humongous 84 inch screen and a screen resolution that is four times the number
of pixels in a conventional HD TV (that is, 1920X1080) – or 4K as it is
popularly called. This release generated quite a buzz at the LG stalls, and I
personally noticed many a gentleman gawking at the TV in silent amazement – the
84 inch screen was really impressive!
As far as I know, the launch of the LG 4K TV – the model is
named as LG 84LM9600 - in India has been concurrent with its global launch,
making it the largest flat panel TV that sports a 4K resolution – at least for
one full month – as Sony is also expected to launch an 84 inch screen 4K TV –
called the Sony XBR-84X900 by November end, 2012. Still later, and over the
next year, more TV makers – JVC, for example – are also expected to join the
fray.
Here is another interesting piece of information – all these
84 inch giants have one thing in common – they are all passive 3D TVs. When
viewed together with the intricacies of the technology and the attendant costs
involved, many observers suspect that the panels for all these brands are being
supplied by one company – LG. Of course, LG representatives have refused to
confirm this, only asserting that the panels in LG 4K 3D TVs are made by LG.
Make your own interpretations!
Now coming to the all important question – is it the right
time for 4K TV? Is the TV viewer ready for an ultra definition TV that has a
huge screen size and is priced to match? Well, look at it this way – when HD
made its debut many years back, it had its fair share of skeptics. The world is
not ready for this yet – they said – and no one is going to pay this much for a
TV. But look at where we are today – HD TVs are commonplace, and much more
affordable. Going still back in time, top of the line Plasma TVs cost as high
as US $ 5,000 or more when they were introduced.
In other words, this is what happens with every new
technology that is adapted for consumer use – the initial prices are too high
for general users, but some dedicated band of power users just cannot wait, and
do the buying. This increases production, gradually making things cheaper and
more affordable for general users.
As far as the giant size of the screen – 84 inches (that is
7 feet!) – is concerned, a 4K resolution actually demands such a large screen.
The average screen size of TVs is increasing – people are buying larger screen
sizes, and the trend is clearly in favor of larger screens. When one moves to
screen sizes 72 inch and above, the picture quality on the screen actually
demands more pixels – hence the need for 4K resolutions.
I can still envision some skeptical observers, those who
will point out that ours is a country that has not yet even adopted digital
broadcast, and even “normal” HD TVs are out of reach for a huge majority of
viewers. Yet, I can safely venture that 4K IS the future of TV watching – even
if that future takes a long to come to fruition.